There comes a time in the lifecycle of every technology where it’s given a name based on some preconceived notion that the technology itself makes obsolete. For example, the term “horseless carriage” is given to something with the assumption that carriages require a horse, and so, therefore, the thing that sets the “horseless carriage” apart from a “carriage” is that it lacks one. The tern “cordless phone” has this same shortcoming. But does this make sense? At what point do we stop referring to something by its antiquated nomer, and just call it like it is?
- Follow So What You're Saying Is… on WordPress.com
So What’s Popular Is…
-
So What You Said Was…
So What You’re Tweeting Is…
- More Reasons Ghosts Don't Exist wp.me/pUUL1-9d 7 years ago
- Two Three Five wp.me/pUUL1-9a 7 years ago
- The Sweet Spot – Three Alarm Mix wp.me/pUUL1-97 7 years ago
- Fish Parade wp.me/pUUL1-95 7 years ago
- Fresh Fish wp.me/pUUL1-93 7 years ago
So What You Categorized Is...
So What You Tagged Was…
2015 albums alewives America apocalypse Apple art bathroom beer Brewster burrito cartoon consumerism costumes dancing demons disaster economy elbow encounter fake fiction fight film fish FNI foot in mouth Friday frustration fun funny games ghosts ghouls hiking hurricane imadethis internet iOS iPad iPad 2 lime literature LP lunch march Massachusetts Minecraft movie music nature oops paranormal pareidolia physics placebo record salesman science SoundCloud space spirits taxes technology the wife time-lapse UFC unemployment update urgent video videogames vinyl virus weather